Falana files lawsuits against Mark Zuckerberg?s Meta, demands $5m over invasion of privacy
Femi Falana, a prominent Nigerian human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), has initiated legal action against Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook, accusing the tech giant of invading his privacy. Falana is seeking $5 million in damages following the publication of false claims about his health. The lawsuit, filed before a Lagos High Court, alleges that Meta unlawfully shared a video that made misleading claims regarding Falana’s health, causing harm to his reputation and distress to his personal life.
The lawsuit was filed under the Nigerian Constitution and the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023, citing violations of Falana’s privacy rights. Falana’s legal representative, Olumide Babalola, argues that Meta is guilty of publishing inaccurate and harmful content on Facebook. The video in question was posted on the “AfriCare Health Centre” Facebook page, which claimed that Falana had been suffering from prostatitis—a prostate condition—since the age of 50. The video also included a false narrative in which Falana purportedly detailed his struggle with the illness for over 16 years.
The fabricated script attributed to Falana reads as follows: “My name is Femi Falana, and I have been battling prostatitis for over 16 years. At the age of 50, I was diagnosed with this condition. Every day I faced pain, discomfort, and constant fatigue. I had trouble urinating, lower back pain, and other symptoms that made it difficult to live a full life. Despite consulting the best urologists in the country, no one could offer me effective treatment. I was prescribed numerous medications, physical therapy, even surgery, but the problem was that these methods only temporarily relieved the symptoms.”
However, Falana has categorically denied ever suffering from prostatitis or any related health issues. He emphasized that his health is a private matter, and the video’s content is entirely false. He also pointed out that he has never had any interaction with Meta or the “AfriCare Health Centre” Facebook page.
In his legal claim, Falana described the publication as a severe violation of his right to privacy. He argued that the video was not only inaccurate but also unfair and misleading. Falana asserted that the video painted him in a false light, which resulted in significant harm to his personal and professional reputation. He added that the video’s content has caused emotional distress, exposure to ridicule, and has deeply affected his psychological well-being.
The video reportedly went viral and was viewed by millions of users worldwide, amplifying the damage to Falana’s image. Falana stressed that such a public misrepresentation has had far-reaching consequences, including diminishing his standing in society and the professional sphere.
Falana further criticized Meta for what he perceives as negligence in the publication of the video. He accused the company of failing to verify the authenticity of the page or the video before allowing it to be published on their platform. According to Falana, Meta’s lack of due diligence in vetting the content led to the widespread circulation of false claims about his health.
He suggested that Meta acted recklessly, with the sole intent of drawing traffic to its platform in order to boost advertising revenues. This, he argued, was done at the expense of his personal privacy and public image. The negligence exhibited by Meta, Falana claims, is not only a violation of his rights but also an attempt to profit from the distress caused by the false publication.
As a result of the harm caused, Falana is demanding $5 million in damages from Meta. He believes that this amount will serve as compensation for the distress and harm caused by the violation of his privacy and the subsequent damage to his reputation. Falana is also seeking a court order that would require Meta to remove the video from its platform and prevent the further dissemination of the false claims. Additionally, he is asking the court to ensure that such incidents do not occur in the future, and to uphold his fundamental right to privacy.
In his statement, Falana made it clear that the purpose of the lawsuit is not just about seeking financial compensation but also about safeguarding his reputation and fundamental rights. “This suit is necessary to protect my reputation and fundamental right to privacy,” he said. He further argued that the legal action was critical to preventing similar invasions of privacy from happening to other individuals in the future.
This lawsuit raises significant questions about the responsibilities of tech companies like Meta in the age of social media. As platforms that allow users to share content globally, Meta and other companies in the tech industry have an obligation to verify the accuracy of information before allowing it to be disseminated to millions of users. This case could have broader implications for how tech companies handle misinformation and privacy violations in the future.
The case also brings to light the growing concern about privacy and data protection in Nigeria. The Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023, under which Falana has filed his suit, is a significant piece of legislation aimed at protecting individuals’ personal information and ensuring that companies are held accountable for any misuse or breach of such data. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how similar privacy-related issues are addressed in Nigerian courts.
Falana’s lawsuit is not just a personal matter but part of a broader conversation about the regulation of social media platforms. As social media becomes increasingly central to daily life, the risk of false information and privacy violations continues to grow. While social media platforms can provide valuable opportunities for communication and interaction, they also present new challenges in terms of misinformation, defamation, and data protection.
The case against Meta could be a landmark one for Nigeria, especially as the country grapples with how to effectively regulate social media while balancing freedom of expression. Falana’s lawsuit highlights the importance of holding tech companies accountable for the content they publish, particularly when that content can cause real harm to individuals.
Femi Falana’s lawsuit against Meta is a significant legal challenge that raises important questions about privacy, misinformation, and the responsibilities of tech companies. Falana’s strong stance in defending his right to privacy and seeking justice for the harm caused by false claims will likely resonate with many who have experienced similar issues in the digital age. The outcome of the case will not only affect Falana personally but could also have far-reaching implications for social media regulation and privacy protection in Nigeria and beyond.
As the lawsuit progresses, it will be interesting to see how Meta responds and whether the case sets a precedent for future privacy-related lawsuits involving social media platforms.
EXCERPT
Falana files lawsuits against Mark Zuckerberg?s Meta, demands $5m over invasion of privacy
Human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Femi Falana, has filed a $5 million lawsuit against Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook, accusing the tech giant of invading his privacy by publishing false claims about his health. The lawsuit was filed before a Lagos High Court.
Falana, represented by his lawyer Olumide Babalola, brought the case under Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), Sections 24(1)(A) and (E), and Section 34(1)(D) of the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023. He alleges that Meta published a video and motion images on Facebook under the page “AfriCare Health Centre,” falsely claiming that he has been battling prostatitis for over 16 years.
Falana claimed the publication violated his right to privacy and was a breach of Nigeria’s Data Protection Act. “The video and its contents are false, inaccurate, misleading, and unfair to me,” Falana said, adding, “The video paints me in a false light and as such is an invasion of my privacy.”
The human rights lawyer also noted the fabricated claims in the video, which falsely attributed the following statement to him:
“My name is Femi Falana, and I have been battling prostatitis for over 16 years. At the age of 50, I was diagnosed with this condition. Every day I faced pain, discomfort, and constant fatigue. I had trouble urinating, lower back pain, and other symptoms that made it difficult to live a full life. Despite consulting the best urologists in the country, no one could offer me effective treatment. I was prescribed numerous medications, physical therapy, even surgery, but the problem was that these methods only temporarily relieved the symptoms.”Falana strongly refuted the claims, asserting, “I have never suffered any disease known as prostatitis in my life. My health life is part of my private life, and the publication is entirely false, offensive, and fabricated.” He added that he has had no dealings with Meta or the “AfriCare Health Centre” page.
The legal practitioner lamented the impact of the publication on his reputation, stating, “I have been greatly prejudiced by the video. It has painted me in a false light, exposed me to ridicule, and caused me emotional and psychological distress.” He also emphasized that the video had been viewed by millions worldwide since its publication, amplifying the damage.
Falana further accused Meta of negligence, stating, “For their failure to verify the page and video before publishing, I believe the Respondent’s publicity of my name and image in a false light was done carelessly and recklessly to draw traffic to the Respondent’s platform to boost its advertisement revenues.”
He described the video as “reckless, insensitive, disturbing, and an unjustifiable intrusion into my privacy,” adding, “I find the Respondent’s use of my name and image highly offensive and emotionally disturbing. This continues to cause me anxiety, sadness, and exposure to ridicule.”
In addition to the $5 million in damages, Falana is seeking a court order mandating Meta to delete the video and cease further publication of the false claims. He urged the court to rescue his image from being ruined, stating, “This suit is necessary to protect my reputation and fundamental right to privacy.”
Source: LIB
