From Election Victory To Prison: Enugu Govt Accused Of Judicial Abuse As Community Dispute, Political Victory Land Labour Party Candidate Bright Ngene In Jail
A once-local community dispute over financial transparency has evolved into a high-stakes political and legal saga, culminating in the incarceration of Barrister Bright Emeka Ngene—lawyer, Labour Party (LP) candidate, and initially declared winner of the 2023 Enugu State House of Assembly election for Enugu South Urban Constituency.
However, the election was nullified by the court for being inconclusive.
Ngene’s ongoing imprisonment is deeply entangled with both his prior legal advisory role in his community and his subsequent electoral success, which allegedly positioned him as a political threat to the Enugu State government.
The origin of Ngene’s ordeal dates back to his time as legal adviser and secretary of the contract committee for the Town Union of Akwuke Town, a community in Enugu South Local Government Area rich in sand and gravel deposits. These natural resources generate significant revenues, with buyers flocking from across the Enugu metropolis.
Following the expiration of the Town Union’s tenure, a conflict erupted between the Union and the traditional rulers. The latter accused the Union of embezzling ₦15 million and failing to present a proper account to the community. The Union, however, insisted it had submitted a comprehensive financial report addressing the alleged discrepancy.
Unable to resolve the dispute internally, the traditional rulers petitioned the police, and in 2017, Ngene and two others were charged in court on counts of stealing and conspiracy.
At the Enugu State Magistrate Court, the presiding judge, after hearing preliminary arguments, observed that the matter was essentially a domestic issue, best resolved through community dialogue. The case was accordingly referred to the Multi-Door Court House for mediation—a legal route often reserved for non-criminal, intra-community disputes.
Years later, in the lead-up to the 2023 general elections, Ngene entered the race for the Enugu South Urban State Constituency seat under the Labour Party (LP). On March 18, 2023, he emerged victorious, defeating the candidate of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) with a wide margin: LP – 5,865 votes; PDP – 2,098 votes.
The PDP challenged the outcome at the Election Tribunal, arguing that results from eight polling units—collectively holding a voting capacity of 4,250—had been cancelled due to violence. Relying on the margin of lead principle, the tribunal ordered a rerun in those units within 90 days.
Despite the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) conducting the rerun twice, no conclusive results were achieved. According to sources close to the LP campaign, the PDP-led state government exhausted every means to overturn Ngene’s victory—including attempts at rigging—but failed.
YOU MAY READ
Director-General Of NAPTIP Orders Probe Of Sexual Abuse Allegations Against MFM General Overseer, Olukoya
It was in the midst of this political stalemate that attention turned back to the unresolved community matter—still pending before the Multi-Door Court.
Given the Labour Party’s dominant lead, it became apparent that the PDP could not overtake Ngene through the ballot. Allegations emerged that the Enugu State Government escalated the old community dispute into a state matter to obstruct his candidacy and remove him from contention in the rerun.
The Enugu State Government, through its Attorney General, allegedly intervened to reclassify the matter as a state-level criminal case. The case, without notification to the original court or parties involved, was reassigned to a different court—one allegedly aligned with the state’s objectives.
The new court began operating at what observers described as a “supersonic pace,” sitting almost daily. Fair hearing guarantees were reportedly violated. Witnesses were barred, and even the community itself expressed disinterest in continuing the case. However, the court insisted only the Attorney General could discontinue the trial.
Repeated petitions for a transfer of the case to a different judge, citing judicial bias and abuse of process, were denied. Ngene sought a stay of proceedings from the High Court, which was granted initially, but was later revoked under mysterious circumstances. When his legal team tried to verify the revocation, they allegedly found that the case file had gone missing.
On June 28, 2024, the trial court dismissed Ngene’s application for the judge to recuse himself. The judge declared, “This matter must end today.” Without receiving final written addresses from either party, the judge produced a pre-typed 25-page judgment and sentenced Ngene to seven years’ imprisonment for conspiracy and stealing, without the option of a fine.
Following the conviction, Ngene’s legal team appealed to the High Court. However, what followed was a pattern of judicial obstruction. Two different judges handling the appeal recused themselves just before delivering rulings or judgments, each time returning the file to the Chief Judge for reassignment.
On March 11, 2025, a third court was scheduled to deliver a ruling. Yet again, the judge recused himself and sent the matter back to the Chief Judge. As of this report, no new judge has been assigned to hear the case.
Those familiar with the matter allege this is part of a deliberate strategy to keep the case under the influence of state actors, thereby blocking any possibility of relief for Ngene through independent judicial review.
While incarcerated at Enugu State Maximum Security Prison, Ngene was reportedly approached by individuals believed to be PDP operatives. They allegedly offered him freedom on the condition that he would relinquish his political mandate in favor of the PDP.
Ngene is said to have rejected the offer outright, opting to remain imprisoned rather than compromise the electoral will of his constituents.
A source familiar with the case, who asked not to be named, described the situation as a “dangerous abuse of judicial process, designed to eliminate a popular opposition figure under the guise of criminal prosecution.”
The Labour Party has called on the National Judicial Council (NJC) and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to launch an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the alleged wrongful imprisonment of Barrister Bright Emeka Ngene by Magistrate E.D. Onwu of the Enugu South Magistrates’ Court on June 28, 2024.
In July 2024, the Labour Party leadership condemned the seven-year prison sentence handed to Ngene over what it described as a disputed and politically weaponized community-related case. The party formally petitioned INEC, urging it to suspend the planned rerun election in Enugu South Urban Constituency. It argued that holding the election under the circumstances would unfairly benefit the ruling PDP due to the disqualification and incarceration of the LP candidate.
Also, in July 2024, the Enugu State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) joined the campaign to free Ngene from jail. APC Chairman, Chief Ugochukwu Agballah, labeled the imprisonment of the Labour Party candidate as a grave miscarriage of justice. He accused the ruling PDP in Enugu of orchestrating the arrest and sentencing of Ngene as part of a calculated plot to clear the path for its candidate in the rerun election.
Agballah called on national and international human rights organizations to intervene in what he termed “a dangerous precedent in our democracy.”
In response to the allegations, Mr. Dan Nwomeh, Senior Special Assistant on Media to the Governor of Enugu State, dismissed the claims as baseless. He insisted that the case involving Ngene was a long-standing legal matter that predated the current administration and had nothing to do with the state government.
“His case involving alleged embezzlement of community funds predated this administration. Enugu government has no hand whatsoever in his travail,” he said.
Despite the denials, critics argue that the speed, secrecy, and political timing of the judgment raise troubling questions about the intersection of law and politics in Enugu State.
As of now, Bright Ngene remains in Enugu State Maximum Security Prison. No progress has been made on the appeal. His constituents are left without representation, and political tensions in Enugu South Urban Constituency continue to rise. The rerun election remains a subject of fierce contention, with both the Labour Party and the APC calling for Ngene’s immediate release and a halt to further electoral proceedings.
Local civil society groups have begun organizing town hall meetings, advocacy campaigns, and legal workshops to raise awareness of the case. Some have filed amicus briefs urging the courts to act independently and swiftly.
Observers worry that the case could become a dangerous precedent where community-level disputes are converted into political tools to suppress rising opposition, further damaging trust in Nigeria’s democratic institutions.
With no resolution in sight and growing calls for judicial reform, the imprisonment of Bright Ngene has become more than a legal matter—it has emerged as a litmus test for the integrity of the judiciary and the resilience of democratic opposition in Enugu State and beyond.
