Blog

Prof. Mgbeke Fires Back: ‘Natasha’s Lies Can’t Override the Law’ as Akpabio Camp Demands Proof

Prof. Mgbeke has delivered a scathing response to Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s recent allegations against Senate President Godswill Akpabio, describing them as “shameful lies” backed by no credible evidence. In a powerful statement that also called out Dr. Reuben Abati’s defense of Natasha, Mgbeke insists the law must take its course and not be derailed by “self-made drama.” With Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) preparing to lead Akpabio’s legal defense, this political and legal showdown is only just beginning.

In the latest escalation of the controversy surrounding Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s public allegations, Professor Mgbeke has once again delivered a scathing rebuke, this time accusing the senator of fabrications, manipulations, and a calculated strategy of self-victimization aimed at misleading the public and tarnishing reputations.

This comes amid growing public scrutiny following claims made by Natasha against Senate President Godswill Akpabio, in which she alleged sexual harassment and intimidation. The matter, which has now moved from mere political tension to the realm of legal contest, continues to stir strong reactions from legal professionals, political analysts, and observers across the country.

Addressing recent remarks made by veteran journalist and public affairs analyst Dr. Reuben Abati, Prof. Mgbeke expressed dismay, calling his comments “petty” and lacking in professional rigor. According to Prof. Mgbeke, it is disappointing to witness respected voices in the Nigerian media lend themselves to what she describes as a series of unverified claims and “careless utterances” by Natasha. In her view, the media should play a more responsible role in scrutinizing evidence rather than amplifying sensationalism without verification.

YOU MAY READ

No Out-of-Court Settlement”: Prof. Mgbeke and Agbakoba Respond to Natasha Akpoti’s Allegations Against Senate President Akpabio

“She must bring evidence to back up all her claims,” Mgbeke declared, insisting that the burden of proof lies with the accuser in any civil society governed by laws and justice. “One false allegation after another, each more desperate than the last. The truth is glaring for all to see.”

In a sharply worded commentary that drew attention across digital platforms, Prof. Mgbeke called out what she sees as a dangerous pattern of deceit and manipulation. She suggested that Natasha’s behavior fits a broader profile often seen in public life—of individuals who fabricate personal tragedies or incidents in order to gain sympathy, weaponize public opinion, or destabilize their political rivals.

In her words, “Self-persecution is allowed, but it can’t stop the law.” This statement, although simple, encapsulates the legal argument being pushed forward by those aligned with Senate President Akpabio’s defense. They maintain that the courts—not public opinion or social media—are the appropriate venue for resolution. And with a senior legal mind like Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) spearheading Akpabio’s legal team, the intention appears to be the full exposure of what they believe are inconsistencies in Natasha’s claims.

Mgbeke’s response to Abati’s commentary also hinted at disappointment—not just in the content of his remarks, but in the apparent willingness of senior media professionals to wade into a complex, sensitive matter without the full facts. “When a group of people we once believed had even a shred of credibility decides to expose their own ignorance, what else can we expect?” she asked rhetorically. The statement reflects a growing concern among Akpabio’s defenders that the media, especially prominent voices, are amplifying a narrative without cross-checking its accuracy.

YOU MAY READ

The Reckoning of Truth: How LIE-TASHA Miscalculated and Collapsed in Her Web of Deceit

Dr. Sandra C. Duru, another vocal defender of Akpabio and a close ally of Prof. Mgbeke, weighed in with a scathing metaphor that has since gone viral. According to Duru, “A pathological liar and a manipulative soul can twist any truth, fabricate any scenario, and even play the victim in their own self-made drama.” The quote goes on to paint an illustrative picture of such a person as one who might “break into their own expensive car at night and call the insurance company in the morning,” or “fall mysteriously sick during house chores but gently resurrect instantly for gossip and parties.”

While Duru did not mention Natasha directly, the context of the quote and its timing made it clear whom she was referring to. The statement quickly gained traction on social media, with supporters of the Senate President interpreting it as a metaphor for Natasha’s actions and her increasingly public campaign against Akpabio. Critics, on the other hand, accused Mgbeke and Duru of attacking a woman who claims to have been victimized, thereby perpetuating a culture of silence and stigma.

Yet for Mgbeke, the real issue is not gender but credibility. “Trust a serial liar or a cunning mistress at your own risk,” she said, implying that deception, not womanhood, is at the center of this unfolding drama. She insisted that Natasha’s past conduct, including previously withdrawn or controversial allegations against other public officials, undermines her standing as a credible complainant.

Natasha’s defenders, meanwhile, argue that she is being attacked precisely because she dared to speak out. They point to Nigeria’s track record on sexual harassment cases, where survivors often face shame, intimidation, and legal pressure. For them, the backlash from Akpabio’s camp is emblematic of a system that discourages women from seeking justice.

However, the legal team representing Akpabio continues to insist that this case is different. They argue that the contradiction between Natasha’s December 8, 2023, allegation and her public posts on December 9 celebrating Akpabio’s birthday casts doubt on the sincerity of her claim. Agbakoba pointed out during his Lagos press briefing that “juxtaposing an alleged traumatic experience with eulogies the very next day does not align with basic human psychology.”

YOU MAY READ

US-Based Activist Sandra Duru Alleges ₦200 Million Bribe Offer by Senator Natasha to Frame Senate President Akpabio

Adding to the complexity is Natasha’s political ambition and high visibility. A former gubernatorial candidate, businesswoman, and now senator, she is no stranger to the spotlight. Her critics argue that her political ambitions make her more likely to leverage controversy to her advantage. Her supporters, however, say this same visibility makes her more vulnerable to targeted attacks.

For Prof. Mgbeke, there is a broader concern about public morality, truthfulness, and the erosion of justice through sensationalism. “We are no longer dealing with truth-seekers,” she warned. “We are now facing actors who believe that tears on camera and hashtags on social media can substitute for hard evidence.” Her message was clear: the legal process must be allowed to run its course, and distractions must not be permitted to cloud the facts.

International observers are also taking interest in the case, not just for its implications on gender justice but for what it reveals about Nigeria’s legal culture and media environment. While advocacy organizations remain cautious, they have called for a fair, transparent process that respects the rights of both the accuser and the accused.

Meanwhile, Prof. Mgbeke’s rejection of what she calls “the media circus” has resonated with a segment of the public that is increasingly skeptical of the traditional press. She has promised to participate only in interviews with reputable international platforms, distancing herself from what she described as “locally hired, useful-idiot TV stations.” For her, this is not about ratings or retweets—it is a matter of truth, integrity, and long-term justice.

Her critics argue that this framing is unfair and designed to shield Akpabio from legitimate scrutiny. But Prof. Mgbeke appears unfazed. “I smoked her out of every lying hole she crawled into,” she said in a recent post, suggesting that Natasha’s narrative has collapsed under the weight of scrutiny. “What a miscalculation!”

Still, with no court verdict yet rendered and public opinion still divided, the road ahead is anything but settled. Natasha continues to insist on the truth of her claims, and her legal team says they are prepared to present their evidence in court. As the case proceeds, Nigerians are being treated to a political and legal saga that touches on some of the nation’s most sensitive themes: power, gender, credibility, and truth.

No matter the eventual verdict, the case has already reshaped conversations about accountability, evidence, and the dangerous power of narratives. It has also laid bare the challenges faced by public figures caught in scandals where perception can be as consequential as the truth.

For now, Prof. Mgbeke’s message is unwavering: this is not a game of lies or satire. It is, in her words, “a pursuit of truth and justice—and justice will speak.”

Dr. Reuben Abati, this is too petty She must bring evidence to back up all her claims, careless utterances and allegations!

When a group of people we once believed had even a shred of credibility decides to expose their own ignorance, what else can we expect? This is a shameful lie! One false allegation after another, each more desperate than the last. The truth is glaring for all to see!

Self persecution is allowed, but can’t stop the law!

“A pathological liar and a manipulative soul can twist any truth, fabricate any scenario, and even play the victim in their own self-made drama. They’ll break into their own expensive car at night and call the insurance company in the morning, Oscar-worthy! Fall mysteriously sick during house chores but gently resurrect instantly for gossip and parties. Trust a serial liar or a cunning mistress at your own RISK, because deception is their art, manipulation their masterpiece, and destruction is always close behind.” – Dr. Sandra C Duru