Supreme Court Judgment CTC Affirmed Usman’s Position as Labour Party Chairman – Governor Otti
On Wednesday, April 9, in Abuja, supporters of the Senator Esther Nenadi Usman-led National Caretaker Committee (NCC) of the Labour Party (LP) expressed their joy upon the release of the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the Supreme Court judgment that definitively resolved the ongoing leadership dispute within the party. This landmark ruling has significant implications for the internal structure of the Labour Party, and its supporters are keen to see the party move forward with clarity and legal backing.
The judgment delivered by the Supreme Court firmly upheld the legitimacy of Senator Usman’s leadership of the Labour Party. This ruling has been regarded as a turning point in the Labour Party’s internal wrangling, particularly as it pertains to the claims made by the opposing faction led by Barrister Julius Abure. Usman’s faction, which had been at odds with Abure’s group for several months, now stands vindicated as the court confirmed the validity of their leadership.
Governor of Abia State, Dr. Alex Otti, was the first to read excerpts from the court document during the Labour Party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting, which was held in conjunction with an expanded stakeholders’ summit at the Transcorp Hilton Hotel in Abuja. The event was attended by numerous prominent figures within the Labour Party, including its national leader and the 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi. Otti’s announcement provided the much-needed legal clarity for the party’s supporters and members, dispelling doubts about the future direction of the party.
YOU MAY READ
LP Lawmakers Haven’t Given Party a Dime Since 2023 Elections – Abure
The Supreme Court’s ruling has far-reaching consequences for the Labour Party and its future trajectory. According to Otti, the judgment affirmed that the appellants (Usman and others) were right in their legal appeal, and the court went further to issue a stern reminder to politicians to respect the tenures of office as outlined in their respective political party constitutions. This part of the judgment is particularly significant, as it emphasizes the importance of adhering to party constitutions and the democratic processes embedded within them.
The ruling also sets a precedent for the conduct of party leadership and internal governance in the future. As Otti pointed out during his address to the NEC meeting, the Supreme Court’s judgment emphasizes the need for politicians and party members to respect the rules and processes that guide leadership transitions. This is expected to influence not only the Labour Party but also other political parties, reinforcing the importance of transparency and due process in political structures.
Governor Otti also took the opportunity to criticize Barrister Julius Abure, who had been the Labour Party’s factional national chairman before the court’s ruling. Otti accused Abure of trying to retain the position of national chairman despite the expiration of his tenure and the growing resistance within the party. This resistance was reportedly fueled by Abure’s insistence on holding onto power, even when his term had come to an end.
YOU MAY READ
Confusion Surrounds Anambra Labour Party Primaries
Otti recounted an earlier meeting with Abure in which the latter expressed his reluctance to continue in any leadership role. According to Otti, the Labour Party had offered Abure a prestigious position as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees (BoT), but Abure later changed his stance, reversing his decision and insisting on remaining in office as national chairman. This flip-flopping, Otti argued, undermined the internal stability of the party and contributed to the leadership crisis that had embroiled the LP for several months.
In his speech, Otti underscored that the correct procedure for anyone who still desired to hold the national chairmanship position was to follow the appropriate channels. These channels included ward congresses, state congresses, and zonal congresses, from which delegates would emerge for the national convention. Every member of the party, Otti emphasized, was free to contest for leadership positions, but such contests must be conducted according to the party’s constitution and guidelines.
This call for due process within the party reflects a broader push for democratic practices and internal reforms within the Labour Party. Otti’s stance is aligned with the goal of ensuring that leadership transitions are carried out in a manner that reflects the will of the party’s members rather than being determined by a few individuals or factions with personal interests.
YOU MAY READ
Labour Party NWC Refuses to Issue Nomination Forms to Senator Nwoye for April 5th Party Primaries
The Labour Party’s internal leadership crisis has intensified over the past several months, with two major factions laying claim to the party’s national structure. On one hand, there is Usman’s National Caretaker Committee, which has the backing of a significant portion of the party’s members. On the other hand, there is the faction led by Barrister Julius Abure, which had previously held the party’s national chairmanship position but was challenged following the expiration of his tenure.
The dispute over leadership positions within the party has created a tense and divisive atmosphere, with accusations and counteraccusations flying between the factions. Usman’s supporters have consistently argued that Abure’s continued hold on the national chairmanship position was illegal and contrary to the party’s constitution, while Abure’s camp claimed that the transition process had not been properly carried out. The Supreme Court’s judgment has now provided the final word on the matter, confirming Usman’s position as the legitimate leader of the Labour Party.
For Usman’s supporters, the judgment is seen as a victory not only for their faction but also for the party’s democratic processes. It is hoped that the legal clarity provided by the ruling will enable the Labour Party to regroup and reorganize itself for future political challenges. With the 2023 elections still fresh in the minds of many, the party is expected to focus on strengthening its internal cohesion and preparing for upcoming electoral contests.
YOU MAY READ
Valentine Ozigbo officially resigns from the Labour Party
One of the key figures in the Labour Party’s recent rise to prominence is Peter Obi, who was the party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 general election. Obi’s candidacy was widely seen as a turning point for the party, which had struggled to gain significant traction in previous elections. His campaign, which focused on issues such as good governance, economic reforms, and anti-corruption measures, resonated with a large segment of the Nigerian electorate, particularly young people.
Although Obi did not win the presidency, his candidacy brought the Labour Party into the national spotlight and gave it a significant boost in terms of both visibility and political influence. As a result, Obi’s role in the party’s future will be crucial, especially as the party looks to reorganize and strengthen itself following the resolution of the leadership crisis.
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s ruling, there are indications that Obi and other party leaders will play a central role in the party’s efforts to rebuild and reposition itself for future political engagements. As Otti noted during the NEC meeting, the Labour Party must now focus on internal unity and democratic processes to ensure that it can effectively compete in future elections.
The Supreme Court’s judgment is seen as a major step forward in resolving the leadership crisis within the Labour Party, but the work of rebuilding the party is far from over. The party will need to address a range of issues, including internal divisions, leadership reforms, and electoral strategies, if it hopes to remain a viable political force in Nigeria.
YOU MAY READ
Who Will Win the 2025 Anambra Gubernatorial Election?
One of the immediate priorities for the Labour Party will be to convene a national convention where new leaders can be elected in accordance with the party’s constitution. This convention will likely serve as a platform for addressing the concerns of party members, re-establishing unity, and charting a course for the party’s future. Given the party’s recent gains in the 2023 elections, there is significant potential for the Labour Party to grow and expand its influence, but this will require careful planning and effective leadership.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s judgment has provided much-needed clarity in the Labour Party’s leadership dispute, affirming Usman’s position as the legitimate chairperson of the party. While the judgment has resolved one major issue, the party’s future will depend on its ability to unite, strengthen its internal structures, and effectively engage with voters in the coming years. The road ahead may be challenging, but with a clear legal foundation and a commitment to democratic processes, the Labour Party has the opportunity to emerge stronger and more united.
